Legislature(1995 - 1996)
1996-04-22 House Journal
Full Journal pdf1996-04-22 House Journal Page 3925 HB 529 The following was read the second time: HOUSE BILL NO. 529 An Act giving notice of and approving the entry into, and the issuance of certificates of participation in, a lease-purchase agreement for a centralized public health laboratory. with the: Journal Page HES RPT 4DP 1DNP 3474 3 FISCAL NOTES (DHSS, REV, ADM) 3474 FIN RPT 5DP 2DNP 4NR 3838 3 FISCAL NOTES (DHSS, REV, ADM) 3/29/96 3839 1996-04-22 House Journal Page 3926 HB 529 Amendment No. 1 was offered by Representatives Therriault, Brice, Davies, James and Kelly: Page 1, line 2 (title amendment): Delete "centralized" Insert "consolidated" Page 1, line 8: Delete "centralized" Insert "consolidated" Page 1, line 10: Delete "$19,200,000" Insert "$16,648,000" Page 1, line 11: Delete "$3,100,000" Insert "$2,687,700" Page 1, line 12: Delete "23,500,000" Insert "$20,374,500" Representative Therriault moved and asked unanimous consent that Amendment No. 1 be adopted. Representative Toohey objected. The question being: Shall Amendment No. 1 be adopted? The roll was taken with the following result: HB 529 Second Reading Amendment No. 1 YEAS: 19 NAYS: 20 EXCUSED: 1 ABSENT: 0 Yeas: Austerman, Brice, Davies, Elton, Foster, Grussendorf, Ivan, James, Kelly, Kohring, Kubina, Long, Moses, Nicholia, Phillips, Robinson, Therriault, Vezey, Williams 1996-04-22 House Journal Page 3927 HB 529 Nays: Barnes, Brown, Bunde, B.Davis, G.Davis, Finkelstein, Green, Hanley, Kott, Mackie, Martin, Mulder, Navarre, Ogan, Parnell, Porter, Rokeberg, Sanders, Toohey, Willis Excused: Masek And so, Amendment No. 1 was not adopted. Amendment No. 2 was offered by Representative Brice: Page 1, line 9, following "agreement": Insert ", but this authorization is contingent on a labor agreement being entered into for the construction of the facility" Representative Brice moved and asked unanimous consent that Amendment No. 2 be adopted. Representative Martin objected. The question being: Shall Amendment No. 2 be adopted? The roll was taken with the following result: HB 529 Second Reading Amendment No. 2 YEAS: 16 NAYS: 22 EXCUSED: 1 ABSENT: 1 Yeas: Barnes, Brice, Brown, Davies, B.Davis, Elton, Finkelstein, Grussendorf, Ivan, Kubina, Mackie, Navarre, Nicholia, Robinson, Williams, Willis Nays: Austerman, Bunde, G.Davis, Foster, Green, Hanley, James, Kelly, Kohring, Kott, Long, Martin, Mulder, Ogan, Parnell, Phillips, Porter, Rokeberg, Sanders, Therriault, Toohey, Vezey Excused: Masek Absent: Moses And so, Amendment No. 2 was not adopted. 1996-04-22 House Journal Page 3928 HB 529 Representative Vezey moved and asked unanimous consent that HB529 be considered engrossed, advanced to third reading and placed on final passage. Representative Mackie objected. The Speaker stated that HB 529 will be in third reading on the April 24, 1996, calendar.